3GPP TS 24008 PDF

June 15, 2020 0 Comments

3GPP TS V () Technical Specification 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Net. C_REC#3: The cellular host must comply with the behavior defined in [TS] [TS] [TS] for requesting a PDP- Context type. File Name: pycrate_mobile/ # * Created: 3GPP TS Mobile radio interface layer 3 specification. # release 13 (d90).

Author: Judal Tushakar
Country: Moldova, Republic of
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 18 June 2017
Pages: 137
PDF File Size: 11.94 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.48 Mb
ISBN: 394-5-25828-390-6
Downloads: 69168
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tojinn

Every dual-stack bearer still needs to be given an IPv4 address, private or public. This is a major concern against providing dual-stack connectivity using techniques discussed in Section 6. A minimum of one PDN connection is needed to get dual-stack connectivity. The recommendations included in each section are listed in a priority order.

In addition, the following terms are used: Note, some IETF specifications e. 3g;p, there is no standardized method to block such misbehaving UEs. A UE may hence be attached to 3tpp or more gateways via separate connections, i. The configuration can be either local to the device or be managed dynamically using, for example, Open Mobile Alliance OMA management.

MM or Authentication Result: Several cases are discussed in the following sections. Therefore, the security considerations in Section 6 of [RFC] are relevant.

As such, means to minimize broken applications when the cellular host is attached to an IPv6-only network should be encouraged.

The fallback option in this specific case is mostly up 3gpo the UE to implement. Obviously, the support of the full set of features may not be required in some deployment contexts.

This could be used to apply different network quality of service parameters or even differential billing. Introduction IPv6 deployment in 3GPP mobile networks is the only viable solution to the exhaustion of IPv4 addresses in those networks.

A Release-8 UE always requests a dual-stack bearer, but accepts what is assigned by the network. Ensuring IPv6 feature parity among these interface types is important for the sake of specification efficiency, service design simplification, and validation effort optimization.


WSFD-110115 Network Share (GWCN) for LTE

This feature is optional and requires a license. Prefix Delegation IPv6 prefix delegation is a part of Release and 3gp; not covered by any earlier releases. These are generic issues and not only a concern of the EPS. Therefore, cellular device and gateway implementations from different vendors may have varying support for this functionality. The authentication results reported by the test set include:. In addition, a lot of work has been invested by the industry to investigate different transition and deployment scenarios over the years.

The basic EPS architecture is illustrated in Figure 4. However, applications that are IPv4 specific would not work. In particular, the following cause codes can be returned: But the UE stacks must be able to handle address resolution in the manner that they have chosen to represent the interface.

With a dual-stack approach, there is always the potential to fall back to IPv4. This is also a contribution to harmonize operators’ requirements towards device vendors. Operational Aspects of Running Dual-Stack Networks Operating dual-stack networks does imply cost and complexity to 3glp certain extent.

This may be considered as a brokenness situation by some applications. Figure 2 Attach Procedure. Table of Contents 1. With subscriber growth projected to increase even further, and with recent depletion of available IPv4 address space by IANA, 3GPP operators and vendors are now in the process of identifying the scenarios and solutions needed to deploy IPv6.

WSFD Network Share (GWCN) for LTE

Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. Status of This Memo This document is not an Internet Standards Ta specification; it is published for informational purposes. When the cellular host is dual-stack connected i. The impact of keepalive messages would be more severe if multiple applications are issuing those messages e.


240008 is a convenient 2408 to inform the cellular host about various services, including DNS server information. The control-plane traffic always goes through the SGSN. Both mobile hosts and mobile devices with the capability to share their 3GPP mobile connectivity are in scope. Implementation Principles This section contains the following contents: This document is not a standard, and conformance with it is not required in order to claim conformance gs IETF standards for IPv6.

A supporting UE is capable of deriving shared network information from broadcast system information and can select a CN operator from the shared network to serve it. Those operators require that no service degradation is experienced by customers serviced with an IPv6-only model compared to the level of service of customers with legacy IPv4-only devices.

The UE is allowed to use any Interface Identifier it wishes for the other addresses it configures. All subscribers of an operator, and the subscribers’ enabled services, are provisioned in the HLR. The PDN may be an operator-external public or private packet data network or an intra-operator packet data network. In particular, it bears repeating here that the true impact of stateful filtering may be a reduction in security and that the IETF makes no statement, expressed or implied, as to te using the capabilities described in any of these documents ultimately improves security for any individual users or for the 33gpp community as a whole.

Bandwidth in cellular networks must be optimized as much as possible. CLAT may not be required in some contexts, e. For more information on the 3GPP release details, the reader may refer to Section 6. Other types of configurations are not standardized.